04:01:18 GMT <rquast> hi all.. question.. if I create 3 sets using sadd, then I do an sinterstore and create a superset, if I do an srem on one of the 3 sets, will it also update the superset?
04:01:26 GMT <rquast> new to redis
04:08:03 GMT <rquast> I mean sunionstore sorry
12:01:02 GMT <yhf> no I think
12:07:21 GMT <minus> correct, but he's long gone
14:13:07 GMT <l0oky> Hi, when I subscribe to a channel that matches a pattern and I get a publish how can I know from what channel I got a publish?
14:16:45 GMT <l0oky> Is this room active?
14:20:11 GMT <minus> afaik the delivered message contains what channel it was on
14:20:19 GMT <minus> or was it only the pattern?
14:20:28 GMT <minus> the docs should be clear about it
14:23:50 GMT <l0oky> I have a client subscribed to "user:*", so when second client published to "user:456" I need that 456 in the first client
14:24:12 GMT <l0oky> as far as I know SUBSCRIBE command only returns count?
14:26:23 GMT <l0oky> My question is shall my second client publish that 456 information seperately or is publishing to "user:456" enough for the first client (consumer) to receive it
15:09:06 GMT <fireglow> Hello, I have two redis (3.2.3) servers that have different data already. Now I want to link them up. Data must be preserved. Will the data on the slave be transferred to master automatically?
15:42:03 GMT <fireglow> NOPE. Seems like I need to merge them, first.
15:43:41 GMT <minus> yup
15:47:38 GMT <fireglow> minus: is there a preferred way? I'm reading https://redislabs.com/blog/rdb-merger-merge-and-convert-redis-rdb-files
15:52:31 GMT <minus> no idea, never had to do that
16:18:45 GMT <fireglow> Ok, a simple script using foreach and MIGRATE was enough in my case
21:39:47 GMT <iamtony> Hi, whats the best way to replace an entire list or set with new data?
22:09:39 GMT <warik> hello, i am testing redis-cluster and I found that I wasn't able to store as many keys on a single server when it's running in the cluster configuration. (e.g  a standalone redis server can hold, say 20 million keys max but the same server in cluster mode can now only hold 18 million keys) Is that an expected behavior?